Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:20:35 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 07:50:07, blass uri wrote: >>It is based on facts and on experience. Facts like Paderborn and the NL-Ch. >>PUBLIC games and PUBLIC played! >>And experience that no amateur entered the scene 100pts above since I follow >>computerchess some years ago. > >I guess that chesstiger is going to be number 1 in the ssdf list. >I guess the difference will be less than 100 elo but more than 30 elo. Wow, for Thorsten you should now build your own church: you also believe but different than me. :-) >If you look at the results of the ssdf list you can see that the results of >tiger are better than other programs. I haven't seen anything extraordinary. >I did not calculate the exact performance of chesstiger but I see that the >performance of tiger against Fritz3(p90) and fritz532(p200) is clearly more than >2700 and it played many games against them. Fritz3 is meaningless. OK, Fritz5.32. Let's wait and see further games and match results. >It had a slow start against shredder2(p200) but now it starts to win The match is not finished yet and Shredder learns. >I guess it will be the first program with more than 2700 ssdf rating. >Uri Guessing again. ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.