Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 05:33:29 11/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 07:50:07, blass uri wrote: >On November 08, 1999 at 07:33:41, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On November 08, 1999 at 05:48:32, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >> >>>>No problems, I simply cannot believe Tiger being 100pts over the rest. >>> >>>a person who BELIEVES or not believes without having any data himself >>>is a religious person. he has nothing else than prejudices. >>>it is ONE thing to have prejudices, but IMO another thing to defend >>>prejudices the way YOU do it. >>> >>>As a communist i prefer to talk about programs i have, to talk >>>about data i have outplayed on my own machines. >>>And i guess Markus Kaestner would say the same. He HAS >>>outplayed CM6 vs. Tiger as he told you. >>>Still you do not believe , he ? >> >>I have never heard of his results. >> >>>I don't need to "believe" anything. I want to KNOW by facts. >>> >>>so - believe or not believe whatever you want. >>>build a Haralf Faber church of NON-believers. >>> >>>its ok for me. but don't call what you do anything other than >>>religious fanatics, it is not based on facts, it is based >>>on prejudices. And you are even proud to have prejudices. >> >>It is based on facts and on experience. Facts like Paderborn and the NL-Ch. >>PUBLIC games and PUBLIC played! >>And experience that no amateur entered the scene 100pts above since I follow >>computerchess some years ago. > >I guess that chesstiger is going to be number 1 in the ssdf list. >I guess the difference will be less than 100 elo but more than 30 elo. After the few hundred games played and posted by different people, I think it will be just about 30 points better than the second. Enrique >If you look at the results of the ssdf list you can see that the results of >tiger are better than other programs. > >I do not count tournament like paderborn and the NL-ch because opening >preperation is more important in these tournament relative to ssdf games and I >count only the results of the ssdf. > >I did not calculate the exact performance of chesstiger but I see that the >performance of tiger against Fritz3(p90) and fritz532(p200) is clearly more than >2700 and it played many games against them. > >It had a slow start against shredder2(p200) but now it starts to win >I guess it will be the first program with more than 2700 ssdf rating. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.