Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 15:17:23 11/09/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 1999 at 17:17:06, James Robertson wrote:
>Today Kiriakov swept Tiviakov away with a cool sacrifice. I haven't tried my
>program on the position yet, but a little analysis with Crafty convinced me
>Insomniac would never find the move in my lifetime.
>
>rn1r2k1/1bqpbppp/pp2pn2/6N1/2P5/1PN1P3/PBQ1BPPP/3R1RK1 w - - bm Nd5;id Kiriakov
>- Tiviakov, 1999;
>
>How do other programs do? If it doesn't seem to hard, maybe I'll try my program
>on it. :)
>
>James
My modified Crafty 16.19 finds it at ply 10, 1:02. :)
White(1): rn1r2k1/1bqpbppp/pp2pn2/6N1/2P5/1PN1P3/PBQ1BPPP/3R1RK1 w - -
White(1): disp
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
8 | *R| *N| | *R| | | *K| |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
7 | | *B| *Q| *P| *B| *P| *P| *P|
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
6 | *P| *P| | | *P| *N| | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
5 | | | | | | | N | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
4 | | | P | | | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
3 | | P | N | | P | | | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
2 | P | B | Q | | B | P | P | P |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
1 | | | | R | | R | K | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
a b c d e f g h
White(1): analyze
Analyze Mode: type "exit" to terminate.
clearing hash tables
time surplus 0.00 time limit 30.00 (3:00)
nss depth time score variation (1)
1 0.00 0.57 1. Nce4 Nxe4 2. Nxe4
1 0.01 0.60 1. Rd4
lps=100 1 0.03 49/49 1. Qg6
1-> 0.04 0.60 1. Rd4
2 0.07 0.38 1. Rd4 Nc6
2 0.08 0.57 1. Nce4 Nxe4 2. Nxe4
lps=100 2 0.11 49/49 1. Ba3
2-> 0.12 0.57 1. Nce4 Nxe4 2. Nxe4
3 0.13 0.32 1. Nce4 Nxe4 2. Nxe4 Nc6
3 0.15 0.44 1. Na4 h6 2. Nf3
3 0.17 0.56 1. Bh5 Rf8 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3
lps=100 3 0.20 49/49 1. b4
3-> 0.21 0.56 1. Bh5 Rf8 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3
4 0.24 0.37 1. Bh5 Rf8 2. Bf3 Nc6
4 0.29 0.41 1. Na4 e5 2. Qf5 Nc6
lps=102 4 0.41 49/49 1. b4
4-> 0.42 0.41 1. Na4 e5 2. Qf5 Nc6
5 0.55 0.41 1. Na4 h6 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qh7+ Kf8
4. Ne4 Be5
5 0.70 0.55 1. Bh5 Rf8 2. Ne2 e5 3. Bf3 Bxf3 4.
Nxf3
lps=102 5 0.94 49/49 1. Qb1
5-> 0.95 0.55 1. Bh5 Rf8 2. Ne2 e5 3. Bf3 Bxf3 4.
Nxf3
6 1.38 0.55 1. Bh5 g6 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3 d5 4.
Ne2 dxc4 5. Rxd8+ Bxd8 6. bxc4
6 2.31 0.59 1. Na4 e5 2. f4 d6 3. fxe5 dxe5 4.
Rxd8+ Bxd8 5. Qf5
lps=126 6 2.82 49/49 1. Nh3
6-> 2.82 0.59 1. Na4 e5 2. f4 d6 3. fxe5 dxe5 4.
Rxd8+ Bxd8 5. Qf5
7 3.89 0.51 1. Na4 h6 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qh7+ Kf8
4. Ne4 Qc6 5. f3 Be5
7 5.42 0.57 1. Bh5 g6 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3 d5 4.
cxd5 Rxd5 5. Rd4
lps=140 7 6.69 49/49 1. Qc1
7-> 6.69 0.57 1. Bh5 g6 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3 d5 4.
cxd5 Rxd5 5. Rd4
8 8.02 0.52 1. Bh5 g6 2. Bf3 Bxf3 3. Nxf3 Nc6 4.
a3 d5 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Nxd5 Rxd5 7.
Rxd5 exd5
8 14.46 0.62 1. Na4 e5 2. Bh5 g6 3. Bf3 Bxf3 4.
Nxf3 Nc6 5. c5
lps=140 8 17.99 49/49 1. Qd2
8-> 18.00 0.62 1. Na4 e5 2. Bh5 g6 3. Bf3 Bxf3 4.
Nxf3 Nc6 5. c5
9 28.78 0.71 1. Na4 h6 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qh7+ Kf8
4. Ne4 Be5 5. f4 d5 6. c5 dxe4 7. Rxd8+
Qxd8 8. fxe5
lps=150 9 32.97 49/49 1. Qd2
9-> 32.98 0.71 1. Na4 h6 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qh7+ Kf8
4. Ne4 Be5 5. f4 d5 6. c5 dxe4 7. Rxd8+
Qxd8 8. fxe5
10 52.96 0.95 1. Na4 h6 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qh7+ Kf8
4. Ne4 Bxe4 5. Qxe4 Ra7 6. Qh7 Nc6
7. Qh8+ Ke7 8. Qh7
10 1:02 1.26 1. Nd5 exd5 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qxh7+ Kf8
4. cxd5 d6 5. Bh5 Nd7 6. Nxf7 Rdc8
7. Qe4
lps=150 10 1:07 49/49 1. Rd3
10-> 1:07 1.26 1. Nd5 exd5 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qxh7+ Kf8
4. cxd5 d6 5. Bh5 Nd7 6. Nxf7 Rdc8
7. Qe4
11 1:14 0.94 1. Nd5 exd5 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qxh7+ Kf8
4. cxd5 d6 5. Bh5 Rc8 6. Nxf7 Qc5 7.
Qf5 Kg8
lps=151 11 1:45 49/49 1. g4
11-> 1:45 0.94 1. Nd5 exd5 2. Bxf6 Bxf6 3. Qxh7+ Kf8
4. cxd5 d6 5. Bh5 Rc8 6. Nxf7 Qc5 7.
Qf5 Kg8
exit 12 1:45 1/49 1. Nd5
White(1): exit
lps=151
analyze.White(1): analyze complete.
Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.