Author: Stefan Meyer-Kahlen
Date: 00:07:55 11/10/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1999 at 08:20:35, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 08, 1999 at 07:50:07, blass uri wrote: > >>>It is based on facts and on experience. Facts like Paderborn and the NL-Ch. >>>PUBLIC games and PUBLIC played! >>>And experience that no amateur entered the scene 100pts above since I follow >>>computerchess some years ago. >> >>I guess that chesstiger is going to be number 1 in the ssdf list. >>I guess the difference will be less than 100 elo but more than 30 elo. > >Wow, for Thorsten you should now build your own church: you also believe but >different than me. :-) > >>If you look at the results of the ssdf list you can see that the results of >>tiger are better than other programs. > >I haven't seen anything extraordinary. > >>I did not calculate the exact performance of chesstiger but I see that the >>performance of tiger against Fritz3(p90) and fritz532(p200) is clearly more than >>2700 and it played many games against them. > >Fritz3 is meaningless. OK, Fritz5.32. Let's wait and see further games and match >results. > >>It had a slow start against shredder2(p200) but now it starts to win > >The match is not finished yet and Shredder learns. Shredder2 has NO learning at all! Stefan > >>I guess it will be the first program with more than 2700 ssdf rating. >>Uri > >Guessing again. ;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.