Author: blass uri
Date: 23:11:06 11/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 11, 1999 at 21:15:13, leonid wrote: >On November 11, 1999 at 20:21:26, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>>>It's already a lot. My own program had no opening book for 12 years. >>> >>>Real pleasure for me to hear this. >>> >>>But is your game a shareware or pofessional. If it is a shareware what is the >>>address? Before tryed to find it through the Alta Vista but was incapable. And I >>>have strong impression that I have seen the game under this name in the >>>shareware list. >> >>Chess Tiger will be soon commercialized by Schröder BV under the name "The >>REBEL-TIGER". Look at the Rebel Home Page. >> > >Just before I found this message I jumped into big conversation between you and >few other people about the data suted for the end of the game. Was very >surprised to see that some people is not that eager to put space consuming data >into their game. Probably the impact of this data is not that big as I expected. > >I left even there one small remarque when I found that one voice from Quebec >sound to me too familiar... like so many separatist that pollute our soil here. >Actually, I am French speaking and all the description in my game is done in >French. Only I don't like to see in my country bigots and racist that actually >could push my Canada into the shameful Balkans frame. > > >>There has been a demo version of Chess Tiger named "Chess Tiger Light", but it >>was only a very WEAK demo. >> >> >> >> >>>Question is how I can compare? Those "extensions" lost me in the darkness and I >>>see no way out. >> >>Play against strong programs and identify where the problems are. >> >> >> >> Christophe > >It is not that simple as it sound. To undestand what I am been talking about >think about recognition of the speed of the mate solving logic. When logic look >for the minimum number of moves, in order to reach the mate, it will take >certain time. This time will be huge compared with rapid and partial revision of >the same position by specially designed "quick logic". Only "quick logic" can >miss the mate completely, or find it only in much bigger number of moves. This >is why in recognizing the real speed of the logic for solving the mate, or >finding the positional move, every comparison should be executed on the "brute >force" search level. It must be done at fixed depth and without any extensions. >For now, I don't see how this simple task should be performed. > >Leonid. It is not important to find the minimal number of moves for mate in a game and there is no demage in finding mate in a bigger number of moves. The important thing is the level of playing. You can play better by some rules of prunning and extensions. I do not understand how fixed depth without extensions can help you. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.