Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rough framework for an ICC Computer Championship

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:52:09 11/13/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 13, 1999 at 23:49:11, James Swafford wrote:

>On November 13, 1999 at 18:39:07, Peter Kappler wrote:
>
>> but I'm not sure how we'd deal with first
>>round seedings...
>
>Why worry about it?  Just alphabetize the entries, and seed from
>from that.
>

there are two issues about seeding.  If you guarantee that the number
of rounds (R) satisfies this inequality:

  R >= log2(players)

then seeding is immaterial.  It is only an issue when R is too small and
you often have to resort to tiebreaks to pick the winner since so many end
up tied at the end.

The other idea is to not use tie-breaks at all, ever, and have a play-off to
break ties.  If you don't use tiebreaks, seeding is immaterial.  If you do use
them, then make sure R is set as above...


>
>This can get ugly, but I think it appropriate to forfeit the program
>if the operator can't reconnect within an hour.  If somebody is
>*that* worried about it, they could send a copy of there program to
>a third party, ready to resume a game if connection problems occur.
>I personally won't bother.
>


I think that it ought to be handled as follows:  If the 'disconnector'
can show that it was a network problem, the game ought to be continued as
soon as possible, just so the next round isn't delayed.  The network is
very complex, and the northeast can become _very_ congested early in the
evening.  The network has to be thought of as the facilitator for this
event, not something that makes it impossible to pull off.  Simple way to
handle this is that each participant must supply (in their finger notes)
the IP address of their gateway (ISP) machine.  If they get disconnected,
and we can ping the ISP, then they get penalized for the amount of time
they are 'offline'.  If the ISP can't be pinged then we assume it is not
a problem with the end player, but with the network, and there is no penalty
unless it goes beyond what we would term excessive (which needs to be defined).








This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.