Author: blass uri
Date: 16:18:30 11/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 1999 at 14:50:23, Thorsten Czub wrote: >Could you please stop these senseless kind of games >and start some more useful games >in a setting where Shredder e.g. has a faster machine, >or if you don't have a faster machine, why not >use a shredder version that is newer ? >You test shredder2, in the moment shredder 4 is the state- >of the art product. > >I don't see much sense in letting tiger play against a shredder >version from a few years. > >i mean, it is interesting if you live a few years in the past >(do you live a few years in the past in sweden ?) >but all other people in the world live in year 1999... almost all. SSDF always tested in this way and it is not going to change They do not hide the details so I see nothing wrong with it. If you are interested in testing Shredder4 then you can do it but I do not see the point of attacking the ssdf for what they are doing. Tiger12 did better result than nimzo7.32 against shredder2(p200) Nimzo7.32(K6-450) won only 26:14 against Shredder2(p200) and 25:11 is better. Shredder2 has no learning function so there is a good chance that the final result after 40 games will be even better(shredder can repeat a loss and tiger cannot). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.