Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:49:54 11/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 1999 at 19:18:30, blass uri wrote: >SSDF always tested in this way and it is not going to change >They do not hide the details so I see nothing wrong with it. i would not buy a car-magazin if they would relate a citroen Xantia-HDI with a Volkswagen Käfer. >If you are interested in testing Shredder4 then you can do it but I do not see >the point of attacking the ssdf for what they are doing. ? I am critisizing them. Thats not attacking. i have to critisize them because they testing methods are senseless. >Tiger12 did better result than nimzo7.32 against shredder2(p200) aha !! I am sure the Volkswagon Passat will get better test than the Volkswagon Käfer, but does this interest people ? They want to find out if Volkswagon Passat is better than Citroen Xantia. >Nimzo7.32(K6-450) won only 26:14 against Shredder2(p200) and 25:11 is better. aha. >Shredder2 has no learning function so there is a good chance that the final >result after 40 games will be even better(shredder can repeat a loss and tiger >cannot). >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.