Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ODELL'S POST

Author: odell hall

Date: 16:54:22 11/14/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 14, 1999 at 19:15:37, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:

>I am totally amazed at the amount of people who misunderstood this post,
>  He was not talking about giving it away, or else "don't they want to make
>money" and "I thought programers were money movitated" would not've be brought
>up.
>  Now the thread got  carried away with people insulting and saying in more ways
>than one it was a dumb post, He tries to explain this and now it builds to a
>point were of course he is going to be pissed and reply to a response indicating
>his post as stupid, now here comes the we want moderation. Well if the post was
>read correctly to begin with it wouldnt have gotten to this point,
>Yes his wording was too strong "almost criminal" and he knew it was so he said
>"mabey this is too strong" but the spirit of the post says (I want to buy the
>strong chessprograms which are not for sale.)Odell if i am wrong then please
>tell me , this is what I read.
> please people re-read the post taking out the almost criminal and want to
>control there program. I dont want to see this end with someone else that has
>good posts getting kicked.



 Your are absolutely correct, My post is not hard to understand at all, I have
come to the conclusion that I have some enemies here, Every thing I say, even
the smallest metaphor gets twisted and abused, Yet I am not abusive to anyone
else's post. Having said this I see my time is up here at CCC. It seems that
Kids and obnoxious posters have won the day. I wrote a innocent post trying to
understand the reasons why very strong programs are not commericially availble
(ferret and tiger). I was hopeing that I could get a intelligent post explaining
the reasons why.  Luckily I did get two (brucemoreland and David Johnson) Who
explained why it is difficult to publish a program and some of the reasons why
programmers choose not to do.  I wrote back to david johnson thanking him for
his insights.  Then I get a barrage of garbage and insults from people who
obviously did not read my post carefully. Like everyone else I am a computer
chess addict,I enjoy some of the discussions here.  I don't come here to be
insulted, so please if you don't understand my post, either don't reply to it,
or ask me specifically what it is you don't understand.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.