Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Programmers who refuse to share their programs

Author: Bella Freud

Date: 04:25:34 11/15/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 14, 1999 at 19:20:57, KarinsDad wrote:

>On November 14, 1999 at 10:58:39, Bella Freud wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>
>>Find the "some that does". I doubt you'll find them here.
>>
>>
>>Bella
>
>I find your continuous insipid condemnation of the masses here (which include
>some of us who do not see ourselves or others in your light) as monotonous.
>
>KarinsDad :|

Since you are anonymous I believe I do not need to mince my words in dealing
with you. You have no personality to be attacked.

I find your comments patronising and devoid of computer chess content. I mean
all your comments. I do not believe that you are "writing a chess program
without alpha-beta". I think you are making that up in a vain attempt to give
yourself credibility. Reason? Never any computer chess content that shows any
sign of any understanding at all in any of your posts, ever.

I see only dull "let's all (where "all" does not actually mean "all") be
friends" posts, posts from you that attack anyone with any different viewpoint
from the norm, and occasional immensely agressive moderation posts which seem
designed to humiliate those who have been kicked enough already. If you were
trying to make a clubby world where everybody said "have a nice day" and came
here principally to click on an ICD purchase button, then I could understand
your output.

I also see that nobody, except Steve at ICD knows who you are.

This is suspicious in my opinion.

>
>PS. Will you apologize to me

Why should I make any apology to an patronising anonymous whose motives I
distrust?

as well or do you finally see a repetitiveness in
>your subtle, but inflammatory style of writing? How many apologies of yours will
>it take before you stop with the subtle jabs at us all? It's getting old and
>it's obvious that it is not unintentional, regardless of your feigned
>expressions of apology. In other words, it's not a matter of someone being
>offended by what you say. It's a matter of you ensuring that eventually someone
>will be offended. Why do you waste your and our time doing that? If you find
>yourself so far above the rest of us, why do you waste your time here with us?

I should go away so you can continue to have a nice day? You have the judge,
jury and executive power to ensure that.


Bella




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.