Author: blass uri
Date: 05:52:13 11/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 14, 1999 at 19:49:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On November 14, 1999 at 19:18:30, blass uri wrote: > >>SSDF always tested in this way and it is not going to change >>They do not hide the details so I see nothing wrong with it. > >i would not buy a car-magazin if they would relate >a citroen Xantia-HDI with a Volkswagen Käfer. > >>If you are interested in testing Shredder4 then you can do it but I do not see >>the point of attacking the ssdf for what they are doing. > >? >I am critisizing them. Thats not attacking. >i have to critisize them because they testing methods are senseless. I do not agree. There are poeople who are interested in these games and christophe can learn from these games(Tiger lost some games and he can look at them to see the problems) I am interesed to see 1 hour per move games between tiger and crafty but I do not criticize the ssdf for not doing it. They cannot do everyone satisfied. Ed did some games with Rebel against other programs at this time control some monthes ago and the only program with positive score against Rebel was crafty16.6. Crafty16.6 won 2.5:.5 in the public games and Ed admitted that Rebel was going to lose another game. I hope tiger can win crafty at this time control Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.