Author: KarinsDad
Date: 08:19:48 11/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 15, 1999 at 07:25:34, Bella Freud wrote: >On November 14, 1999 at 19:20:57, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On November 14, 1999 at 10:58:39, Bella Freud wrote: >> >>[snip] >>> >>>Find the "some that does". I doubt you'll find them here. >>> >>> >>>Bella >> >>I find your continuous insipid condemnation of the masses here (which include >>some of us who do not see ourselves or others in your light) as monotonous. >> >>KarinsDad :| > >Since you are anonymous I believe I do not need to mince my words in dealing >with you. You have no personality to be attacked. > >I find your comments patronising and devoid of computer chess content. I mean >all your comments. I do not believe that you are "writing a chess program >without alpha-beta". I think you are making that up in a vain attempt to give >yourself credibility. Reason? Never any computer chess content that shows any >sign of any understanding at all in any of your posts, ever. Hmmmm. For someone new here, you sure seem to have read an awful lot of the archived messages. I haven't talked about my program in at least a month, but you sure seem to know a lot about it for someone who has just been posting for less then a month. Or could you be anonymous as well? > >I see only dull "let's all (where "all" does not actually mean "all") be >friends" posts, posts from you that attack anyone with any different viewpoint >from the norm, and occasional immensely agressive moderation posts which seem >designed to humiliate those who have been kicked enough already. If you were >trying to make a clubby world where everybody said "have a nice day" and came >here principally to click on an ICD purchase button, then I could understand >your output. > >I also see that nobody, except Steve at ICD knows who you are. Wrong again. > >This is suspicious in my opinion. > >> >>PS. Will you apologize to me > >Why should I make any apology to an patronising anonymous whose motives I >distrust? > >as well or do you finally see a repetitiveness in >>your subtle, but inflammatory style of writing? How many apologies of yours will >>it take before you stop with the subtle jabs at us all? It's getting old and >>it's obvious that it is not unintentional, regardless of your feigned >>expressions of apology. In other words, it's not a matter of someone being >>offended by what you say. It's a matter of you ensuring that eventually someone >>will be offended. Why do you waste your and our time doing that? If you find >>yourself so far above the rest of us, why do you waste your time here with us? > >I should go away so you can continue to have a nice day? You have the judge, >jury and executive power to ensure that. If you would be a reasonable poster, than I would not have a problem with you. If you would stop your incessant attempts at subtle pokes at other people, then I would not have a problem with you. If you would just stop. But you won't. Hard for a leopard to change his spots. Have a nice day! KarinsDad :) > > >Bella
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.