Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 09:29:05 11/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 1999 at 12:00:57, KarinsDad wrote: >On November 16, 1999 at 07:51:58, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On November 15, 1999 at 22:06:03, Peter McKenzie wrote: >> > >[snip] >>> >>>Of course none of what you say refutes what I said, because I said 'any given >>>position' (which means any possible position) couldn't be compressed into 64 >>>bits. >> >>KQK can be compressed into less than 64 bits. > >I think what Peter was saying is that any random (i.e. any possible) position >may or may not be compressed within 64 bits, but you cannot guarantee that it >will. KQK is not a random position, but rather one which is known to compress >within 64 bits. > >KarinsDad :) Yeah, I know, but I'm having fun! :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.