Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:21:57 11/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 1999 at 09:07:57, Dan Homan wrote: >On November 15, 1999 at 22:18:41, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On November 15, 1999 at 18:51:38, Will Singleton wrote: >>>I think you left out a few folks on the 60 10 side. :) Singleton, Moreland, >>>McKenzie, and perhaps some others I can't recall. :)) >>> >>>Will >> >> >>Sorry, Will - it wasn't intentional. There have been so many posts recently >>that I simply lost track. >> >>I think the voting looks something like this so far: >> >>60 10 - Moreland, McKenzie, Singleton, Stanback >>90 10 - Kappler, Diepeveen, Swafford, Robertson >> >>I can't remember if Amir Ban indicated a preference. >> >>If this thing stays split down the middle, I suppose 75 10 would be a fair >>compromise. >> >>If your name isn't on this list, and you have a preference, please post a reply! >> >>--Peter > >I vote for 60 10, but I would still play if it was 90 10. > > - Dan Either is fine by me. 60 10 is more fun to watch. 90 10 is slightly better chess. instead of 90 10, I might even suggest 60 30 as a better replacement. But 60 10 is fine by me...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.