Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger performance rating 2726 is 4. in the World list !!??

Author: Micheal Cummings

Date: 16:11:26 11/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 1999 at 17:26:00, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On November 17, 1999 at 01:36:32, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>
>>On November 17, 1999 at 01:18:49, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, if Chess Tiger gets 2726 rating from SSDF games, it goes to
>>>place 4. in PCA world list (after Kramnik and BEFORE Anand). Ridiculous or ??
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>I will be paying little attention to the SSDF, until they can play more programs
>>than the 4 they have only played on the faster hardware, I will take the results
>>with a grain of salt. To me I will deduct the rankings from the 200MMX machine
>>results.
>
>Do you mean you want to calculate the rating of the programs they have tested on
>K6 by taking only the results of these programs against P200MMX programs?
>Because you think programs on 200MMX have more reliable ratings?
>
>If you do, can you post the list please?
>
>
>    Christophe

Howdy, No I want them to play more than 4 programs on the 450 machines, I think
it would be clearer to play the top 10 programs on the 450 machines and rank
them on that, rather than play a select group of programs and ranking them using
calulations between faster and slower hardward.

Most of the recent programs have all been played on the 200MMX machines so we
pretty much know how good they are in relation to each other.

For example CM6K is better on the 200MMX than all the other programs, And I
think is way better than Nimzo which is No 4 on the 450 machines on the last
list ahead of CM6K. This is not right in my opinion, where would CM6K be if it
was played on faster hardware as the other 4 programs.

That is what I mean, at the moment the list is unfair.

And with this ranking thing for working out the elo of programs, if all was fair
why are the top four programs that far in front, either way I cannot explain
what I mean in the rankings, it just seems like I have always said that it is
selectively unfair



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.