Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 17:49:55 11/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
I am playing a mail-chess game against an anonymous guy.
Here is the game:
Thorsten Czub - Rudi
1.d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Sc3 Sf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Dxf3 Dxd4
6. Le3 Dh4+ 7. g3 Dg4 8. 0-0-0 Dxf3 9. Sxf3 c6
{until here it was "book"}
10. Lg2 Sbd7 11. The1 e6 12. Sd4 Lc5 13. Sa4 Lxd4
14. Lxd4 0-0 15. b3 Te8 16. Sb2 Sb6 17. Sd3 Sfd5
18. c4 Sf6 19. Lf3 Sfd7 20. Sf4 Kf8 21. Lb2 a5 22. La3+ Kg8
23. c5 a4 24. cxb6 axb3 25. Kb2 bxa2 26. Kxa2 Sxb6
27. Kb3 e5 28. Lc5 Sd7 29. Ld6 f6 30. Sd3 Sf8 31. Kb2 Le6
32. Sc5 Ta2+ 33.. Kc1 Txh2 34. Te2 Txe2 35. Lxe2 Lc8
36. Lc4+ Se6 37. Se4 Td8 38. Td3 b5 39. La2 Kf7 40. Ta3 f5
41. Lc7 Th8 42. Sd6+ Kf6 43. Lb6 Tf8
44. Ta7
If you want we can let this game "replay" by several
chess programs, as an example, and relate the evaluations of the programs
to see that tiger has completely different score than any other.
For the beginning i would like YOU to replay whites moves with your
famous chess programs and to post the evaluation right behind
the white moves, say after let white compute 10 minutes on a fast
pc for each move.
After we have some other programs i can present tigers score for each position
with white to move and we can altogether confirm: tiger evaluates different
than other programs.
Now you can guess WHY or ask Christophe :-))) and i hope he will not
really tell you.
because somehow it seems to be the secret of its playing strength :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.