Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 18:36:56 11/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 1999 at 19:58:23, Micheal Cummings wrote: >On November 17, 1999 at 19:44:10, Bella Freud wrote: > > >>>No Chris, you don't get it. >> >> >>Two points. You don't get it if you make incorrect naming assertions. And I do >>get it. You don't more like it. > >Hmmm, I don't get what this means, can someone explain it. And if from the >little I do understand how do you get it Bella. If you are new here and all. > >Who is he mistaking you for ?? > >Now Bella also there is no need to start another fight over this simple mistaken >identity is there, that is unless you want too ?? Bella was being accused of being someone else, and was responding to this. So it seems to me that she did not instigate this, and her answers to the finnish of the post also seems that she addressed the issue of her name and then went on with the post. Also, it is clear that there is no proof that she is not who she says she is, only speculations. Maybe one of you two can clear this part of this on topic chess post for me.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.