Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 21:32:46 11/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 1999 at 20:49:55, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>I am playing a mail-chess game against an anonymous guy.
>Here is the game:
>
>
>
> Thorsten Czub - Rudi
>
> 1.d4 d5 2. e4 dxe4 3. Sc3 Sf6 4. f3 exf3 5. Dxf3 Dxd4
> 6. Le3 Dh4+ 7. g3 Dg4 8. 0-0-0 Dxf3 9. Sxf3 c6
> {until here it was "book"}
> 10. Lg2 Sbd7 11. The1 e6 12. Sd4 Lc5 13. Sa4 Lxd4
> 14. Lxd4 0-0 15. b3 Te8 16. Sb2 Sb6 17. Sd3 Sfd5
> 18. c4 Sf6 19. Lf3 Sfd7 20. Sf4 Kf8 21. Lb2 a5 22. La3+ Kg8
> 23. c5 a4 24. cxb6 axb3 25. Kb2 bxa2 26. Kxa2 Sxb6
> 27. Kb3 e5 28. Lc5 Sd7 29. Ld6 f6 30. Sd3 Sf8 31. Kb2 Le6
> 32. Sc5 Ta2+ 33.. Kc1 Txh2 34. Te2 Txe2 35. Lxe2 Lc8
> 36. Lc4+ Se6 37. Se4 Td8 38. Td3 b5 39. La2 Kf7 40. Ta3 f5
> 41. Lc7 Th8 42. Sd6+ Kf6 43. Lb6 Tf8
> 44. Ta7
>
>If you want we can let this game "replay" by several
>chess programs, as an example, and relate the evaluations of the programs
>to see that tiger has completely different score than any other.
>
>For the beginning i would like YOU to replay whites moves with your
>famous chess programs and to post the evaluation right behind
>the white moves, say after let white compute 10 minutes on a fast
>pc for each move.
>
>After we have some other programs i can present tigers score for each position
>with white to move and we can altogether confirm: tiger evaluates different
>than other programs.
>
>Now you can guess WHY or ask Christophe :-))) and i hope he will not
>really tell you.
>because somehow it seems to be the secret of its playing strength :-))
I can do this tonight. Let me make sure: T is rook, S is Knight, L is Bishop,
and D is Queen?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.