Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 22:37:41 11/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 1999 at 21:36:56, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:
>On November 17, 1999 at 19:58:23, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>
>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:44:10, Bella Freud wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>No Chris, you don't get it.
>>>
>>>
>>>Two points. You don't get it if you make incorrect naming assertions. And I do
>>>get it. You don't more like it.
>>
>>Hmmm, I don't get what this means, can someone explain it. And if from the
>>little I do understand how do you get it Bella. If you are new here and all.
>>
>>Who is he mistaking you for ??
>>
>>Now Bella also there is no need to start another fight over this simple mistaken
>>identity is there, that is unless you want too ??
>
>Bella was being accused of being someone else, and was responding to this.
It is not an accusation.
I have not made any accusation nor asked for any punishment.
I have been talking with "Bella", but my mind is clear about who this person is,
and I have no problem with it. I just wanted this person to know.
I have answered to "Bella" in another post. There is an interesting technical
discussion going on, well, no problem at all.
Please, I have not made an accusation.
> So it seems to me that she did not instigate this, and her answers to the
>finnish of the post also seems that she addressed the issue of her name and then
>went on with the post. Also, it is clear that
>there is no proof that she is not who she says she is, only speculations.
Absolutely. My mind is clear about it, but I understand other people can still
hesitate.
This is not a problem. As far as there is only a technical discussion about
computer chess, it's fine.
Christophe
>Maybe one of you two can clear this part of this on topic chess post for me.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.