Author: Pete Galati
Date: 07:49:39 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 02:18:02, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On November 17, 1999 at 10:33:52, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On November 17, 1999 at 03:07:31, Torstein Hall wrote: >> >>>On November 17, 1999 at 01:38:23, Don Matthys wrote: >>> >>>>On November 17, 1999 at 01:33:54, Don Matthys wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Go to: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newproducts/Framenewpro.htm/ >>>>> >>>>>and click on the three underlined phrases to see three screen images (one of >>>>>which changes when you move your mouse over it). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Don >>>> >>>>My previous link has an error. Leave off the final forward slash. >>>> >>>>http://www.chessbase.com/newproducts/Framenewpro.htm >>>> >>>>Don >>> >>>Its even more pictures at the chessbase site if you look at the german version >>>of it. >>> >>>Torstein >> >>I'm not sure what people are using to judge something as a "standard Windows >>program" but that's not a standard Windows program in my book, it looks good, >>but that's not standard to me. >> >>Pete > >If it isn't standard, what Windows interface guidelines aren't being adhered to? > >Dave I would call a standard Windows program something to the effect of Wordpad, or the Bringer Chess program or Netscape Navigator, all having the Standard Windows configurtion where you have the Title bar with all of it's standard features and then a line of pulldown menus, and then below that the program. I have no objection to Chessbase's interfaces, they work ok and they look good, but they are somewhat less convenient than what _I_ consider a standard Windows program. So I may be wrong about how I define standard, how do you define a standard Windows program? Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.