Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 09:51:01 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 01:37:41, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On November 17, 1999 at 21:36:56, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:
>
>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:58:23, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>>
>>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:44:10, Bella Freud wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>No Chris, you don't get it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Two points. You don't get it if you make incorrect naming assertions. And I do
>>>>get it. You don't more like it.
>>>
>>>Hmmm, I don't get what this means, can someone explain it. And if from the
>>>little I do understand how do you get it Bella. If you are new here and all.
>>>
>>>Who is he mistaking you for ??
>>>
>>>Now Bella also there is no need to start another fight over this simple mistaken
>>>identity is there, that is unless you want too ??
>>
>>Bella was being accused of being someone else, and was responding to this.
>
>
>It is not an accusation.
>
>I have not made any accusation nor asked for any punishment.
>
>I have been talking with "Bella", but my mind is clear about who this person is,
>and I have no problem with it. I just wanted this person to know.
>
>I have answered to "Bella" in another post. There is an interesting technical
>discussion going on, well, no problem at all.
>
>Please, I have not made an accusation.
>
>
>
>> So it seems to me that she did not instigate this, and her answers to the
>>finnish of the post also seems that she addressed the issue of her name and then
>>went on with the post. Also, it is clear that
>>there is no proof that she is not who she says she is, only speculations.
>
>
>Absolutely. My mind is clear about it, but I understand other people can still
>hesitate.
>
>This is not a problem. As far as there is only a technical discussion about
>computer chess, it's fine.
>
>
>
> Christophe
>
>
if you called bella chris, and chris got removed and other people do not think
that bella is chris but your convinced, you may not care if she continues to
post but others will and then others will be looking to nit pick the hell out of
her posts especially if chris offended alot of people here and these people now
feel bella is chris,what is the point in calling her chris in public?
I didnt understand this when i very first read the post, but when bella reply to
it all of sudden we have a couple people jumping down her throat with both feet,
this is not right, do you think it is? I dont know chris or style of his
writing but it seems whenever bella writes a post people jump on it looking to
see if there is some hidding thing there.I feel this is because alot of people
think it is chris.this would make a person become very defensive, it removes the
benefit of the doubt.you replied to bella's post saying that you feel like she
is saying you tuned your engine to other programs I am not a programmer so i did
not get this feeling, it felt like A.you know its chris so B.it must be a shot
at you or something? or did bella's description of what she thought the engine
did decribe a tunning to specific programs?? I am just a normal reader of posts
and no programming experience so mabey i am blind to somethings :) but I am not
trying to offend anyone I just do not understand some people get there posts
torn to shreads and others which I have seen as blatant and worse do not. I am
only one person that can get offended in different ways than others can and
understand this fact, but sometimes it looks like theres a whitch hunt going on.
Thanks,
Lanny
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.