Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:32:23 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 01:31:02, Michel Langeveld wrote: [snip] >If the root has a higher depth then (one of) the succ. position then we can try >to enhance the plydepth of the succ. position by backtracking. For example > >Position A) 1.e4 0.00/19 (0.00 at 19 ply) >Position B) 1. e4 e5 -3.00/10 (-3.00 at 10 ply) > >Then we can analyze: >C1) 1.e4 e5 2.a3 (??/17) >C2) 1.e4 e5 2.a4 (??/17) >C3) 1.e4 e5 2.b3 (??/17) >C4) 1.e4 e5 2.b4 (??/17) >.. >.. >Cx) 1.e4 e5 2.h6 (??/17) >Cx) 1.e4 e5 2.h7 (??/17) > >Although I think if both Position A & B are analysed at CAP time control it will >be enough to analyse C1 - Cx at CAP time control. But infact I think such ply >difference like Position A & B can't exist in practise (at least not often). The average is 13 plies with a large standard deviation. The low mark (for positions not leading directly to mate) is 10 and the high 61 plies.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.