Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:34:53 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 12:51:01, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:
>On November 18, 1999 at 01:37:41, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On November 17, 1999 at 21:36:56, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote:
>>
>>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:58:23, Micheal Cummings wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:44:10, Bella Freud wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>No Chris, you don't get it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Two points. You don't get it if you make incorrect naming assertions. And I do
>>>>>get it. You don't more like it.
>>>>
>>>>Hmmm, I don't get what this means, can someone explain it. And if from the
>>>>little I do understand how do you get it Bella. If you are new here and all.
>>>>
>>>>Who is he mistaking you for ??
>>>>
>>>>Now Bella also there is no need to start another fight over this simple mistaken
>>>>identity is there, that is unless you want too ??
>>>
>>>Bella was being accused of being someone else, and was responding to this.
>>
>>
>>It is not an accusation.
>>
>>I have not made any accusation nor asked for any punishment.
>>
>>I have been talking with "Bella", but my mind is clear about who this person is,
>>and I have no problem with it. I just wanted this person to know.
>>
>>I have answered to "Bella" in another post. There is an interesting technical
>>discussion going on, well, no problem at all.
>>
>>Please, I have not made an accusation.
>>
>>
>>
>>> So it seems to me that she did not instigate this, and her answers to the
>>>finnish of the post also seems that she addressed the issue of her name and then
>>>went on with the post. Also, it is clear that
>>>there is no proof that she is not who she says she is, only speculations.
>>
>>
>>Absolutely. My mind is clear about it, but I understand other people can still
>>hesitate.
>>
>>This is not a problem. As far as there is only a technical discussion about
>>computer chess, it's fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>>
>>
>if you called bella chris, and chris got removed and other people do not think
>that bella is chris but your convinced, you may not care if she continues to
>post but others will and then others will be looking to nit pick the hell out of
>her posts especially if chris offended alot of people here and these people now
>feel bella is chris,what is the point in calling her chris in public?
>I didnt understand this when i very first read the post, but when bella reply to
>it all of sudden we have a couple people jumping down her throat with both feet,
> this is not right, do you think it is? I dont know chris or style of his
>writing but it seems whenever bella writes a post people jump on it looking to
>see if there is some hidding thing there.I feel this is because alot of people
>think it is chris.this would make a person become very defensive, it removes the
>benefit of the doubt.you replied to bella's post saying that you feel like she
>is saying you tuned your engine to other programs I am not a programmer so i did
>not get this feeling, it felt like A.you know its chris so B.it must be a shot
>at you or something? or did bella's description of what she thought the engine
>did decribe a tunning to specific programs?? I am just a normal reader of posts
>and no programming experience so mabey i am blind to somethings :) but I am not
>trying to offend anyone I just do not understand some people get there posts
>torn to shreads and others which I have seen as blatant and worse do not. I am
>only one person that can get offended in different ways than others can and
>understand this fact, but sometimes it looks like theres a whitch hunt going on.
> Thanks,
> Lanny
I have expressed my opinion already.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.