Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 15:34:36 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 15:33:35, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On November 18, 1999 at 14:34:53, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On November 18, 1999 at 12:51:01, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 1999 at 01:37:41, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On November 17, 1999 at 21:36:56, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:58:23, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 17, 1999 at 19:44:10, Bella Freud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>No Chris, you don't get it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Two points. You don't get it if you make incorrect naming assertions. And I do >>>>>>>get it. You don't more like it. >>>>>> >>>>>>Hmmm, I don't get what this means, can someone explain it. And if from the >>>>>>little I do understand how do you get it Bella. If you are new here and all. >>>>>> >>>>>>Who is he mistaking you for ?? >>>>>> >>>>>>Now Bella also there is no need to start another fight over this simple mistaken >>>>>>identity is there, that is unless you want too ?? >>>>> >>>>>Bella was being accused of being someone else, and was responding to this. >>>> >>>> >>>>It is not an accusation. >>>> >>>>I have not made any accusation nor asked for any punishment. >>>> >>>>I have been talking with "Bella", but my mind is clear about who this person is, >>>>and I have no problem with it. I just wanted this person to know. >>>> >>>>I have answered to "Bella" in another post. There is an interesting technical >>>>discussion going on, well, no problem at all. >>>> >>>>Please, I have not made an accusation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> So it seems to me that she did not instigate this, and her answers to the >>>>>finnish of the post also seems that she addressed the issue of her name and then >>>>>went on with the post. Also, it is clear that >>>>>there is no proof that she is not who she says she is, only speculations. >>>> >>>> >>>>Absolutely. My mind is clear about it, but I understand other people can still >>>>hesitate. >>>> >>>>This is not a problem. As far as there is only a technical discussion about >>>>computer chess, it's fine. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Christophe >>>> >>>> >>>if you called bella chris, and chris got removed and other people do not think >>>that bella is chris but your convinced, you may not care if she continues to >>>post but others will and then others will be looking to nit pick the hell out of >>>her posts especially if chris offended alot of people here and these people now >>>feel bella is chris,what is the point in calling her chris in public? >>>I didnt understand this when i very first read the post, but when bella reply to >>>it all of sudden we have a couple people jumping down her throat with both feet, >>> this is not right, do you think it is? I dont know chris or style of his >>>writing but it seems whenever bella writes a post people jump on it looking to >>>see if there is some hidding thing there.I feel this is because alot of people >>>think it is chris.this would make a person become very defensive, it removes the >>>benefit of the doubt.you replied to bella's post saying that you feel like she >>>is saying you tuned your engine to other programs I am not a programmer so i did >>>not get this feeling, it felt like A.you know its chris so B.it must be a shot >>>at you or something? or did bella's description of what she thought the engine >>>did decribe a tunning to specific programs?? I am just a normal reader of posts >>>and no programming experience so mabey i am blind to somethings :) but I am not >>>trying to offend anyone I just do not understand some people get there posts >>>torn to shreads and others which I have seen as blatant and worse do not. I am >>>only one person that can get offended in different ways than others can and >>>understand this fact, but sometimes it looks like theres a whitch hunt going on. >>> Thanks, >>> Lanny >> >> >>I have expressed my opinion already. >> >> >> Christophe > >Ok. I must be missing something. > By you calling Bella, Chris, you DID accuse her of being someone else so yes >an accusation was made. > >You may be clear in your mind who she is but since she is taking so much crap >from people >about her being someone else... I guess i am saying you can be clearly >wrong,Unless she e-mailed you and told you she was chris in that case then, Ok. > >Also, I just wanted to know why you thought she said that about your program? > I wanted an honest answer if it was because you "Know" she is Chris. > >I am not asking these questions to aggrevate I just want to understand this >stuff thats going on here and why are most people wanting Bella banned? because >I am inclined to think it is because most people feel she is someone else,and i >am trying to help give someone a fair deal here I only have my words to use and >if I make you angry I am sorry but I wanted an actual answer not a "I already >expressed my oppinion" like I am some lowlife that you dont want to deal with. >I am asking this so for you to reflect and be able to give the benifit of the >doubt incase there is that miniscule chance you are wrong.because if people are >wrong and she is Bella how does anyone make up for reading things in her posts >which may not be taken the right way because of preconcieved Ideas and having a >witch hunt, I think this would be a horrible thing and should not be going on >with intelligent people. Again I promise this is not to make you or anyone else >upset. From day one, this person has thrived on airing her opinions which have cause nothing more than Non Computer Chess arguments. From what I hear the moderators have asked her to cut it out. So she then goes and says she has been a good girl while ripping the hell out of Karinsdad. She has dropped so many hints and said many things which leads to the conclusion that she is not who she seems. And from day one of becoming a memeber here she ENJOYS creating and joining in on fights, and she can go as far as I am concerned. I picked up on it her first day here when she said things were a disgrace and no better than r.g.c.c , well frankly if she feels that way, Bella or Chris or whoever the hell she is has already done a fine job of posting 90% fight causing posts and getting away with it. Trouble makers look for trouble. Even if she is a Bella, its too late, her reputation is shot. This is the last post I will ever write about her, and any of her posts I will make sure to skip. I do not trust whoever Bella is.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.