Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:43:51 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 18:42:42, Charles Unruh wrote: >Theories on Tiger's success. No book learning, no anti-prog x play(?)? It is >Amazing that it appears that tiger 12.0 could end up being 30 to 40 points >higher rated than any other program, without book learning or optimizations >against the vatious programs. there is nothing strange with this. tiger is a class better. > I haven't got around to testing my tiger 12, but >it's the results are good enough evidence for me.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.