Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 23:29:11 11/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 18, 1999 at 18:35:02, Thorsten Czub wrote: >What i wanted to say is: > >We have programs like > >Mchess >Hiarcs >CSTal >Tiger. > >They all evaluate positions in a big range of scores. >Higher positional or speculative scores than other programs. > >But - >Most often when you see Mchess/Hiarcs/Cstal evaluate the positions >and also from iteration to iteration and often within an interation >you see the score jump and fail-high, fail-low, changes etc. > >Tiger is different. >It has the same high range to evaluate, but from first second of computation >to the play out the move the jumps and the score is not changing much. > >the score increases or decreases very close to the end-result. >it gets a fail-high or a fail-low or whatever window, and the next >big main-line is only 1/100 of a pawn better or weaker. >it all goes more smooth. more like a wave, not like a quantum leap. >not jumping but flowing like a river. > >anmon has this kind of evaluation too, but still different to tiger. So the question to Christophe is: "are you using an mtd() technique?" Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.