Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Bean counters argument

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 00:08:35 11/19/99

Go up one level in this thread



>>>>
>>>>Do I have a defective disc or is Nimzo 7.32 a defective program in this
>>>>area? Or have I missed something?
>>>>

>
>There is no contradiction.
>you do not lose more than few elo ratings by not knowing KBN vs K and KBB vs K
>
>Uri

This is the typical bean counters argument: Rating points.
You do not lose more than a few rating points by not knowing this and that,
so what you get is kind of a cripple chess with some nice features like the
insufficient material feature.
I want a chess program to be able to play chess in *any* possible position.
Every thing else is poor. I don't mind about rating points in computer chess.
Kind regards
Bernhard



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.