Author: blass uri
Date: 12:26:24 11/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 1999 at 13:02:27, Peter Kappler wrote: > >Anatoli, > >Thanks for your post. Very interesting. Nice to know that there are some very >strong players here. > >But, I am surprised that Fritz is your favorite engine. Tactically, it's >fantastic, but it seems to me that Hiarcs has better positional understanding. >Everybody else seems to think this too, so I'm wondering what we are all >missing. Not everybody else seems to think so. I do not. There are cases when Hiarcs is superior in tactics and there are cases when Fritz is superior in positional understanding. It is not clear to me that Hiarcs is a better positional player. It is dependent on the opening. I remember from looking in comp-comp games cases when Fritz532 won Hiarcs thanks to better positional understanding Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.