Author: Tina Long
Date: 21:40:56 11/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
Thanks guys for those responses. There are several things I'll now think about when considering how these numbers should be estimated. Different programs perform differently with extra/less speed, and quite inconsistantly when you comepare expected results with oppents played at 2 speeds. Variances for speed + variances for number of games I'm assuming are multipilcative not added (ie +/- 20% plus +/- 20% equals +/- 44.4%). I'd still like such a list, but the confidence levels would be giant. Lets see what's on the SSDF list next weekend, from my casual viewing of results posted here I'm expecting H7.32 up a bit, F5.32 down a bit, & Tigger (the bouncing stuffed animal from Pooh) to be on top. Thanks again guys Tina
This page took 0.21 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.