Author: blass uri
Date: 02:07:33 11/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 1999 at 03:11:14, Anatoli wrote: >On November 21, 1999 at 13:02:27, Peter Kappler wrote: > >> >>Anatoli, >> >>Thanks for your post. Very interesting. Nice to know that there are some very >>strong players here. >> >>But, I am surprised that Fritz is your favorite engine. Tactically, it's >>fantastic, but it seems to me that Hiarcs has better positional understanding. >>Everybody else seems to think this too, so I'm wondering what we are all >>missing. >> >>It would be great if you could post some key positions from your correspondence >>games where Fritz and Hiarcs were confused. >> >>--Peter > >Peter ! >I have just returned from my job dead tired. But I promise that I'll send here >the most impressive examples from my games to prove my point of view. As for >Fritz and Hiarcs, Fritz CAN lose blitz games to Hiarcs, but it has much higher >understanding of chess at all stages of a game. I strongly emphasize it. >My best wishes to everybody >anatoli I do not agree that it has much bigger understanding at all stages of a game. It is dependent in the position. It is possible that this is the case in your games. Fritz's main problem is that it is a root processor and sometimes the evaluation is changed drastically after trading queens not because of the fact that it sees more and this does not happen to hiarcs. I think that chessbase should release an option for Fritz when Fritz is not a root processor and do not care about doing it slower because they do not have to use this option for comp-comp games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.