Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Can someone here enhance the next SSDF list please.

Author: Eelco de Groot

Date: 16:21:21 11/22/99

Go up one level in this thread




You're welcome of course, Tina. But I really better be more careful about saying
such things, you might even want to take me up on it, just to pay a visit to
topside one day and I'm not even capable of finding enough space here to
accomodate two computers...The least thing I could do is throw some stuff out
now. Tomorrow I get new computertable, that should give me some floorspace back!

Christophe asked about how much memory the Sinclair Spectrum had, I found the
original folder! (Someone should tell me to throw some of this away, to sort the
more important things out and be more responsible, please..) There were two
versions, one with 16K, but only 9kB if you used highres graphics, and a 48kB
version. Prices: 125 and 175 pound, British ones. A bargain compared with 450
pounds you had to put down on the table for the TRS 80 Colour, with 16kB. I
thought those Colour Tandys were NTSC, translating to Never The Same Colour, so
that's why we didn't see a lot of them over here in Europe? Anyway the Spectrum,
I never owned one,  was a big improvement over the ZX 81 which I started out
with. That had a separate 16 kB memory block that that you stuck in the back.
However the slightest touch and gone were hours of typing in Basic statements,
much to chagrin of my sister who wanted to learn some of that too.

I also found some interesting articles on computer chess of which I wonder if
they are widely known. This one was "A Five-Year Plan For Automatic Chess",
dated somewhere around 1966 or 1967, published in "Machine learning and
heuristic programming". It was by a Mr. Good, Trinity College, Oxford, and the
second paragraph starts: "The complexity and originality of a master chess
player is perhaps greater than that of a professional economist" Would you
believe that! It could have been said right today by someone, no? Do you think
this Good was an alias?

About you multipilcating variances, (sp), (sp! I finally found out what that
meant, thought it meant "species" at first, ignorable me), I think you are right
but think you know much better than me, also. If I find evidence to the contrary
I will post on this topic and place again.

 Bye!
 Eelco



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.