Author: Tina Long
Date: 00:46:26 11/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 1999 at 03:25:05, Micheal Cummings wrote: >On November 23, 1999 at 01:38:45, Tina Long wrote: > >>On November 22, 1999 at 18:28:11, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >> >>I filled out the survey & sent my details for more information. >>One question is asked twice, that detracts from your credibility a little. >> >>I disagree with everything Micheal says below. >>That doesn't matter at all,although disagreeing with Everything is unique. >> >>>I will not fill out this survey cause I feel it will produce limited results. >>> >>>No mention of presentation of the interface. >>>In the section where you asked for 3 features, there are usually 10+ features >>>which I think are REQUIRED features. >>> >>>I think the survey is very limited and will produce a porgram which will be >>>below current standards. >>> >>>As for asking for a name and stuff, get rid of that and many more people will >>>respond. >> >>that was voluntary if you wanted more info, it's clear at the start that >>identgification is not required. >> >>> >>>It depends on what you want the program to do, but it seems to me that you will >>>creating another chesspartner program. > >Tina as always even if you agreed with me you would disagree, that is the kind >of relationship we seemed to have formed :) > >As you state the credability or the thought put into this survey is pretty weak. >To me they would end up with a Chessmaster senario. Asking for advice but >missing points which should not be missed. > >To me this program is more of a hobby that her husband will be making. Serious >chess programs require more than what they are asking for in advice. > >As always Tina your words match you stunning beauty. > >I bet some people will take offence to my comments about you, but they just do >not seem to realise the special relationship we have Tina. :) > >As always I can count on your to reply to yet another post of mine with your >positively stunning negative comments to my post :) > >P.S - I stand by my words on the survey. We agree to disagree here, & that's not a bad thing. Look at it from the Author's point of view. He may be creating the next Cheesbase or Tigger. How does he know what the marketplace wants? The survey may be Great or Crap that doesn't matter, it is the feedback that he gets that matters. Your comments may help this Author & others to create better Surveys. All the replys he gets may stop the Author from working on "mentoring" and cause him to concentrate on "analysis" features. Note also that the Authors spouse is conducting the survey, & that she has used an "Internet Survey Company" to help create the survey. I think these are all positive steps that deserve encouragement. Better than fully creating a program, showing it to the market, and the market says, "but I want this, I don't want that". gotta go, Summertime's for cycling!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.