Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does this make any sense? Anyone tried?

Author: Paul Clarke

Date: 05:43:38 11/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 1999 at 09:27:17, Jari Huikari wrote:

>Assume that chess program N is playing a game with SLOW time controls.
>Number of nodes grows exponentially when search goes iteratively deeper.
>Program N thinks that best move is A. However A leads to loss, but behind
>the horizon of N.
>
>It would take terribly much time for N to search deep enough to avoid
>the bad move A. So it plays it and looses the game. (Also assume that
>N haven't enough knowledge to avoid playing A.)
>
>PERHAPS it could be avoided to play A, if program N tried to PLAY ON
>the game for some moves. If it played on (with shallower search for
>each halfmove), it could perhaps see that something very bad happens, if
>it plays A.

<delurk>

I think Chinook (the draughts/checkers program) uses a similar idea. After, for
example, an 11-ply search, it plays the first four ply of the PV and then does a
9-ply search of the resulting position. If this shows the score dropping
substantially, Chinook will allocate more time and try to search more deeply.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.