Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess Tiger under CA 5.0!

Author: Robert Pawlak

Date: 19:09:05 11/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 27, 1999 at 18:32:40, Charles Unruh wrote:

>On November 27, 1999 at 10:15:06, Robert Pawlak wrote:
>
>>I suspect some people in the group may have missed it, but the current SSDF
>>champion is going to be an analysis engine for Chess Assistant! Convekta/CA has
>>been super secrective up to this point, but it looks like they have really
>>dropped a bombshell.
>>
>>This is incredible, because people have long wanted a few more choices for
>>internal analysis than Zarkov and Crafty. So CA reaches into their hat and pulls
>>out a Tiger!
>>
>>Bob P.
>
>
>NO!!!!!!  Why not just make it a chessbase, that's what i have, and most others
>as well, why not sell to the largest pool of potential buyers.  Well i guess,
>they were the only ones to offer the bucks.  Truth of the matter is i just hate
>having to jump to different progs to get analysis.  I love being able to jump
>from f5 to j5 to h7(would say Nimzo but who uses that:)), it's so easy.  Guess
>i'll just have to keep using the dos version of tiger :(

True, many use Chessbase. But there are also those that like CA, and with this
offering, they have addressed one of the main concerns of their users.

Variety is generally a good thing. Plus, there is a bit more to analyzing a game
than having a program do a blunder check at X sec/move. so there is still room
for separate database and playing programs.

I suspect money was not the issue here. If you talk about bucks, Chessbase
probably has more than most of the other software houses. I think it was
probably idealogy more than other factors. It could also be that Christophe
knows something about the new CA 5 that others do not.

Bob P.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.