Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 00:23:01 11/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 1999 at 00:46:40, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On November 27, 1999 at 22:31:28, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >Alittle bit strong ! I do not agree with the post in general. But it does raise >a question that I have for SSDf. That is why did they test Chess Tiger before >its release and not for example, Fritz6, Ferrit, Junior6 and just curious, why >is crafty not tested ? >I asking these questions not in arrogance cause I know there has to be a good >reason, just would like to hear them. > >Wayne > Tiger was tested because Chris offered it to them and they said yes. As for the other programs they simply decided to use them. That is why some said there was a SSDF, Chessbase conspiracy, but I just think they chose first to test those programs cause they simply felt like it. Plus who is to say whether this Tiger program will work as good as the DOS one when it is put into windows. To me Tiger's results are the same as if Bruce and Ferret was in the list at number one. I repeat I have nothing against Chris and Tiger, and we had a discussion already about the fairness of the SSDF list and came to an agreement, that even though the list is not really fair, its the best they can do with what they have. Which to me is still not good enough.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.