Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 02:34:23 11/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 1999 at 05:05:52, Alexander Kure wrote: >On November 27, 1999 at 22:25:30, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On November 27, 1999 at 22:02:49, eric guttenberg wrote: >> >>>Most of the interest generated by the new SSDF ratings has been in >>>the performance of the impressive Tiger program. But I am intrigued >>>by Nimzo 7.32. >>>Nimzo ranked respectably in the standings, slightly behind F5.32 and >>>ahead of Junior 5 and Hiarcs 7.32. Yet at the Thuringer tournaments >>>earlier this month, it not only produced 0 wins in 13 rounds and >>>last place but according to Marcus Kaestner's eyewitness account >>>produced a quality of play that was laughable, unbelievably bad, >>>game after awful game. >>>Has anyone discovered an explanation for this? >>> >>>eric >> >>I don't know exactly, >>but in general there is a big difference between nimzo >>using its normal (big) book and nimzo using its tournament book. >> > > >There is a difference. > > >>Using the general book it doesn't do very well at the icc server >>either against crafty, diep and many others at somewhat slower levels. > > >Sorry Vincent, that is not true. Nimzo does for example extremly well (> 50%) >against crafty at 30 1 (just do a search to find out). Is that is against Bob's crafty? Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.