Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nimzo's SSDF result vs. Thuringer result

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 03:49:40 11/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On November 28, 1999 at 05:00:30, Alexander Kure wrote:

>On November 28, 1999 at 04:17:05, Marcus Kaestner wrote:
>
>>>
>>>I don't know exactly,
>>>but in general there is a big difference between nimzo
>>>using its normal (big) book and nimzo using its tournament book.
>>>
>>>Using the general book it doesn't do very well at the icc server
>>>either against crafty, diep and many others at somewhat slower levels.
>>>
>>>Just the difference between these books already makes this huge difference
>>>between winning an event or losing an event for nimzo.
>>>
>>>Idem for some other programs.
>>
>>hi vincent,
>>
>>here you could be right! i´ve made some tests again shredder 4, Fritz 6 and
>>rebel century for the new chessbits and analyzed the games. the following thing
>>was coming out:
>>
>>in 60 games nimzo got a result of +9/-7/0
>>that means nimzo was much stronger than the opponents in the opening. it scored
>>10:1 so overall a plus of 9 points! in the middlegame it was much weaker than
>>the others, making an overall minus of 7, in the endgame it was of equal
>>strength.
>>
>>i was very surprised about the influence of the fantastic kure-book.
>>
>>marcus
>
>
>I am sorry but I don't agree, that the book of Nimzo has such an overhelming
>influence on Nimzo's overall performance. Why not try to play testgames without
>using an opening book at all to find out?

I agree with you. I did quite a lot of testing with Nimzo 7.32 without book and
its performance is just as good as indicated by the SSDF list. Nimzo is a very
strong (and fast!) program.

Enrique

>Greetings
>Alex



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.