Author: Alexander Kure
Date: 10:36:55 11/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 1999 at 07:36:10, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 28, 1999 at 05:05:52, Alexander Kure wrote: > >Search moron varguz, most recent games: > >4.5 - 1.5 > >Let's analyze the games a bit will we, next msg cuz i gotta eat first > > 0 2590 Varguz 2592 Moron 0-1 [ su 30 30] A14 Res 17-Nov-99 > 1 2592 Moron 2590 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] D10 Res 17-Nov-99 > 2 2637 Varguz 2527 Moron = [ su 30 30] B22 Agr 14-Nov-99 > 3 2527 Moron 2637 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] B33 Res 14-Nov-99 > 4 2637 Varguz 2527 Moron 1-0 [ su 30 30] B81 Res 14-Nov-99 > 5 2527 Moron 2637 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] A21 Res 14-Nov-99 > > >>On November 27, 1999 at 22:25:30, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On November 27, 1999 at 22:02:49, eric guttenberg wrote: >>> >>>>Most of the interest generated by the new SSDF ratings has been in >>>>the performance of the impressive Tiger program. But I am intrigued >>>>by Nimzo 7.32. >>>>Nimzo ranked respectably in the standings, slightly behind F5.32 and >>>>ahead of Junior 5 and Hiarcs 7.32. Yet at the Thuringer tournaments >>>>earlier this month, it not only produced 0 wins in 13 rounds and >>>>last place but according to Marcus Kaestner's eyewitness account >>>>produced a quality of play that was laughable, unbelievably bad, >>>>game after awful game. >>>>Has anyone discovered an explanation for this? >>>> >>>>eric >>> >>>I don't know exactly, >>>but in general there is a big difference between nimzo >>>using its normal (big) book and nimzo using its tournament book. >>> >> >> >>There is a difference. >> >> >>>Using the general book it doesn't do very well at the icc server >>>either against crafty, diep and many others at somewhat slower levels. >> >> >>Sorry Vincent, that is not true. Nimzo does for example extremly well (> 50%) >>against crafty at 30 1 (just do a search to find out). >> >> >>> >>>Just the difference between these books already makes this huge difference >>>between winning an event or losing an event for nimzo. >>> >> >>I do not agree! At SSDF Nimzo 7.32 playes with his standard book and got >>reasonable results. I do not know what book they used at Thueringen tournament, >>but no matter what book they used, it would not make much difference on Nimzo's >>overall performance. >> >>>Idem for some other programs. Hi Vincent, whenever you need help from statistics, get all information (search VArguz Moron standard): 0 2590 Varguz 2592 Moron 0-1 [ su 30 30] A14 Res 17-Nov-99 1 2592 Moron 2590 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] D10 Res 17-Nov-99 2 2637 Varguz 2527 Moron = [ su 30 30] B22 Agr 14-Nov-99 3 2527 Moron 2637 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] B33 Res 14-Nov-99 4 2637 Varguz 2527 Moron 1-0 [ su 30 30] B81 Res 14-Nov-99 5 2527 Moron 2637 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] A21 Res 14-Nov-99 6 2469 Moron 2550 Varguz 1-0 [ su 30 30] E92 Mat 30-Aug-99 7 2550 Varguz 2469 Moron 0-1 [ su 60 30] C56 Res 30-Aug-99 8 2469 Moron 2550 Varguz 0-1 [ su 60 30] A13 Mat 30-Aug-99 9 2550 Varguz 2398 Moron 1-0 [ sr 30 30] A05 Mat 28-Aug-99 10 2403 Moron 2523 Varguz 1-0 [ sr 30 30] A04 Res 28-Aug-99 11 2580 Varguz 2393 Moron 1-0 [ sr 30 30] C99 Mat 27-Aug-99 12 2390 Moron 2551 Varguz 0-1 [ sr 30 30] B06 Res 27-Aug-99 game 0 and game 1 both ended after 8 moves: I resigned cause i wanted to go to bed. So practically they do not count. The rest gives a perfect 50% score, for 30 30 and the two 60 30 games. Greetings Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.