Author: Marcos Christensen
Date: 12:58:05 11/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 1999 at 12:00:19, Charles Unruh wrote:
> 1 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2696
>2 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671
>3 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2663
>4 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2644
>5 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2636
>6 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2619
>
>
>Now i personally think that H7.32 certainly plays many bonehead moves and have
>never had any special place in my heart for it, and by the way, i do seem to
>notice that most of the H7.32 fanatics have been becoming increasingly quiet as
>of late hahahah. Anyway despite this i can hardly believe that nimzo 99 is
>higher rated than h7.32 because i know it to play a ton of even more boneheaded
>moves!.
H 7.32 amd k6/450 16M hash=44kn/s (hiarcsmark)
H 7.32 cel 400 16M hash=47kn/s
H 7.32 cel 400@500 16M hash=60kn/s
The answer is simple. Hiarcs dont like amd processors.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.