Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 12:05:49 11/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 1999 at 14:30:40, Dan Andersson wrote: >33: - 1189 W 2195 chesspartner [ bu 5 0] B10 Res Mon Nov 29, 14:58 CST 1999 >34: - 1189 B 2195 chesspartner [ bu 5 0] C01 Res Mon Nov 29, 15:02 CST 1999 >35: - 1189 B 2093 Computer [ bu 3 0] C00 Res Tue Nov 30, 14:01 CST 1999 > >Why do you complain? Computers sometimes play bad in closed positions, thats >all. True. But ChessTiger certainly has a lot more trouble with em. Because of the games above and the time this arrived I assume you were watching while I was playing it. You might also have noted I played a bunch of games vs The Crazy Bishop after that. You might also have noted me getting killed each time. And finally, you might have noted that I played another one vs ChessTiger and it allowed me to do the same thing again - nearly -. This time it *did* break trough. But only after a lot of pointless piece-shuffling. I rest my case: you can hardly call this a "quite knowledge based program". >I hardly think that you had anyting like a superior position at the >disconnect. But you played well in a defensive, do nothing, kind of way. Very right. But that was also the way Chesstiger played. I could already have claimed a draw, but because I was way up on time, I didn't. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.