Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 23:00:27 11/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 1999 at 16:56:36, Dan Andersson wrote: >I dont want to sound agressive, but 'nearly' doesnt mean anything to me. I >nearly always lose on time in superior positions at 2 0, but then again I win a >lot of lost games on time. Nice point ;) > I dont want to find excuses for chesstiger, as it >doesnt need them. But you are right that CT plays badly in those games. >Stonewall- and Slav-like positions are hard on computers, maybe excepting REBEL >(Hint to ED, teach your arcane knowledge to Christophe). If it can be done without compromising comp-comp play, they'll probably do it someday. That would give some interesting results... >The crazy bishop is one >of my favorite programs, and to win against it you should aim for an equal >endgame (equal in material, that is) as it wery bad at endgames. Thanks for the hint. I'll try it someday, but I suck at endgames as much as I suck at chess. TCB was really crushing (for me) in those close positions. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.