Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 00:34:06 12/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 1999 at 22:13:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 30, 1999 at 18:44:38, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On November 30, 1999 at 17:36:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On November 30, 1999 at 11:30:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>Interesting. My 17.2 never even looks at it. Could it be a fluke of move >>>>ordering under multiple CPU's? Do you get the same answer each time? >>>> >>>>Crafty 17.2 vs ferret >>>>pondering enabled. >>>>EGTB cache memory = 16M bytes. >>>>hash table memory = 48M bytes. >>>>pawn hash table memory = 8M bytes. >>>>play best book line after search. >>>>EGTB access enabled >>>>using tbpath=e:/crafty/release/tb,F:/KBP >>>>4 piece tablebase files found >>>>1302kb of RAM used for TB indices and decompression tables >>>> >>>> >>>>Crafty v17.2 >>>> >>>>White(1): epdpfga epd.epd epd.out >>>>PFGA: EPD record: 1 >>>>middle-game phase >>>> clearing hash tables >>>> time surplus 0.00 time limit 133:20 (133:20) >>>> nss depth time score variation (1) >>>> 6 1.02 0.27 1. Rf3 Rd8 2. Qf2 Nd4 3. Re3 Bg4 >>>> 6 1.47 0.31 1. Qd1 Qd7 2. Qf3 Bg4 3. Qd5 Rae8 <HT> >>>> 6-> 1.74 0.31 1. Qd1 Qd7 2. Qf3 Bg4 3. Qd5 Rae8 <HT> >>>> 7 2.80 0.30 1. Qd1 Nb4 2. Qf3 b6 3. a4 Nxd3 4. >>>> cxd3 c5 >>>> 7 4.03 0.31 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Rg3 Qd4+ 3. Qf2 Qf6 4. >>>> c3 Rae8 >>>> 7-> 5.11 0.31 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Rg3 Qd4+ 3. Qf2 Qf6 4. >>>> c3 Rae8 >>>> 8 6.81 0.35 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Rg3 Qd4+ 3. Qf2 Qf6 4. >>>> c5 Rae8 5. c4 >>>> 8-> 10.70 0.35 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Rg3 Qd4+ 3. Qf2 Qf6 4. >>>> c5 Rae8 5. c4 >>>> 9 19.52 0.43 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Qf2 Qd4 3. Qxd4 Nxd4 >>>> 4. Rg3 g5 5. c3 Nf5 >>>> 9-> 22.12 0.43 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Qf2 Qd4 3. Qxd4 Nxd4 >>>> 4. Rg3 g5 5. c3 Nf5 >>>> 10 1:18 0.52 1. Rf3 Rd7 2. Rg3 h5 3. Qf2 h4 4. Rg5 >>>> h3 5. Qg3 f6 >>>> 10-> 1:25 0.52 1. Rf3 Rd7 2. Rg3 h5 3. Qf2 h4 4. Rg5 >>>> h3 5. Qg3 f6 >>>> 11 3:01 0.41 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Qf2 Nb4 3. Rg3 Nxd3 4. >>>> cxd3 Bg4 5. Bxc7 Be2 6. Re1 Bxd3 7. >>>> Rxe7 Qxe7 8. Rxd3 Qxc7 >>>> 11-> 4:19 0.41 1. Rf3 Qd7 2. Qf2 Nb4 3. Rg3 Nxd3 4. >>>> cxd3 Bg4 5. Bxc7 Be2 6. Re1 Bxd3 7. >>>> Rxe7 Qxe7 8. Rxd3 Qxc7 >>>> 12 13:28 0.57 1. Rf3 h5 2. Rg3 f6 3. Re1 Rc8 4. Rge3 >>>> Qf7 5. Qf2 <HT> >>>> 12-> 15:16 0.57 1. Rf3 h5 2. Rg3 f6 3. Re1 Rc8 4. Rge3 >>>> Qf7 5. Qf2 <HT> >>>> 13 23:45 1/38 1. Rf3 >>> >>> >>>this looks similar to mine. How the other 17.2 got +1.something is beyond me, >>>as it has a huge penalty for trading a bishop for two pawns... >> >>3 pawns. 1 Bxh6 gxh6 2 Qxh6 f5 3 Bxf5... > > >you are looking too far ahead. Check the original Rebel output... 3 moves only, OK. Context matters. My comments were based solely on the output generated by crafty. >Bxh6 gxh6 Qxh6 and there the captures stopped. But even a piece for 3 pawns >loses most of the time, unless the pawns are well advanced and mobile... > >or unless it is an attack that works of course...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.