Author: Martin Grabriel
Date: 09:08:17 12/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
Agreed. Probably I got my engine settings wrong. Thanks for the comments On December 01, 1999 at 07:46:14, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On December 01, 1999 at 05:35:33, Martin Grabriel wrote: > >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "1999.12.01"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Fritz 6"] >>[Black "User"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[ECO "D31"] >>[PlyCount "76"] >>[EventDate "1999.12.01"] >> >>1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c6 4. e3 Bd6 >>5. Nf3 f5 6. c5 Bc7 7. Bd3 g5 8. O-O g4 9. Ne5 Nd7 10. f4 Nh6 11. Qb3 Nf7 12. >>Nxf7 Kxf7 13. Bd2 Qh4 14. Be1 Qh5 15. Bc2 Rg8 16. Rd1 Rg6 17. Bf2 Rh6 18. Bg3 >>Nf6 19. Rfe1 Ne4 20. Nxe4 fxe4 21. Rc1 Bd8 22. a3 Bh4 23. Rcd1 Bxg3 24. hxg3 >>Qh2+ 25. Kf1 Qxg3 26. Kg1 Rh2 27. Re2 h5 28. Red2 h4 29. Re2 h3 30. Rdd2 hxg2 >>31. Rxg2 Rxg2+ 32. Rxg2 Qe1+ 33. Kh2 Bd7 34. Rd2 Rh8+ 35. Kg2 Qh1+ 36. Kf2 Rh2+ >>37. Kg3 Qg1+ 38. Rg2 Qxg2# 0-1 > >22. a3 looks pretty bad, as well as 23. Rcd1. They both waste time, which black >can spend by mounting an assault on the white king. 24. Kf2 looks better than >Kf1. After 26. Kg1, black has a mate in 4: 26. ...Qh2+ 27. Kf2 g3+ 28. Kf1 Qh1+ >29. Qxg2# >White's 27th move also allows a mate in 4. >What kind of machine were you running this on? Fritz shouldn't miss things as >simple as a mate-in-4... > >This game doesn't seem to show much understanding of King-safety from Fritz, >either. :(
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.