Author: blass uri
Date: 23:57:18 12/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 1999 at 12:22:19, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On December 01, 1999 at 10:39:41, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>While white may only be rated at <1200 fics it is also possible that this >person only plays high rated computers and had only played a few games making >this <1200 rating meaningless. > >Not at all...my 1200 blitz rating is probably fairly accurate. >But I am a chess programmer and have some knowlegde of typical >computer weaknesses. It may not help my chess a lot, but it does >help when playing vs computers. Most top programs are more or less >resistant to those techniques nowadays, but ChessTiger wasn't. >And payed the price... I looked at the game and I believe that chesstiger has good chances to win the game. There are many pieces on the board and I think that you could lose on time if the game continues when the computer plays many quite moves and push a pawn. I think that the final position of tiger is better. it can push the pawns against your king and I do not believe that you are going to avoid a tactical mistake. The fact that tiger does not hurry to do it can cause you time trouble and the chance for tactical mistakes is bigger. It is not important if you lose a game in 20 move or in 200 moves. Maybe you can save the game in longer time control but I am not sure about it because tiger may find better moves in longer time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.