Author: James T. Walker
Date: 06:22:52 12/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 1999 at 06:43:04, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >First 3 games Rebel-Tiger against Shredder 4. Tiger was on a PII-300 with 64MB >hashtables and Shredder on a PIII-500 with 128MB hash and Nalimov tablebases. >With strict chess rules, S4 would have lost the third game on time, given the >delay I mentioned in another post between playing and transmitting moves. It's >interesting to see how it manages against a program that is 2.5 times faster in >tactics. Very fine program this Shredder 4. > >Enrique > Hello Enrique, I missed your other post concerning the delay between transmitting and playing moves. I'm not sure what you mean by Shredder losing on time. If you are playing Auto232 games it seems to me that Shredder should only lose if the time has expired on it's own clock before making the time control. If you mean that Rebel-Tiger claimed a win on time when Shredder still showed time on it's own clock then Shredder should not lose because of the delay. Just my opinion of course. Jim Walker
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.