Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Static evaluation after the "Positional/Real Sacrifice"

Author: Jon Dart

Date: 09:22:44 12/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 03, 1999 at 11:13:11, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On December 03, 1999 at 10:09:31, Jon Dart wrote:
>
>>This is Arasan 5.3's score:
>>
>>material score = 114
>>white pawn score = -4
>>black pawn score = -3
>>outside pawn score = 3
>>king safety(w) proximity = 0 cover = -31 mlevel = 10
>>battery (b): score = -20 mate= 0 stack = 0
>>battery (b): score = -24 mate= 0 stack = 1
>>king safety(b) proximity = -65 cover = -72 mlevel = 10
>>net king safety score = 101
>>total score =  0.42
>>
>
>I'd say that Black's King is significantly less "covered" than White's.
>

That's what the output is saying. "cover" is always negative and
Black's score is more negative .. so Black's king is less "covered".

--Jon



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.