Author: Will Singleton
Date: 15:10:03 12/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1999 at 08:49:19, Andrew Williams wrote: >Over the last few days, I have been fascinated by the discussions on CCC >about positional sacrifices. Some of the discussion has centred on the value >assigned to the attack that is obtained after the sacrifice and I was wondering >how other programs evaluated the position after Hossa's sac: > >r3q1k1/ppp1rp2/2n1b2Q/8/2P5/3B4/PPP2RPP/5RK1 b - - 0 2 > >This is after 1. Bxh6 gxh6 2. Qxh6 from the original position posted by >Peter McKenzie. PostModernist's static evaluation of the position is presented >below. Essentially, it thinks that White is winning by 0.71. The ATTACKTOTAL >score is generated by analyzing the squares around the King to see how many of >them are attacked and what sorts of pieces are attacking them. Please note that >not all the factors that contribute to PM's score are included in the output >below. > >Could other programmers post similar information? I believe that even an >overall static evaluation would be interesting. > >Cheers > >Andrew Williams > > > >SCORE ANALYSIS >BLACK to move > >MATERIAL -137 (Positive means WHITE has more material) W:19086 B:19223 >Game stage M >Actual moves played: 1 (halfMoves=1) > >Fifty move counter: 0 > >r=547 # # # q=1040 # k=15939 # > >o=103 o=106 o=103 # r=565 o=94 # # > > # # n=346 # b=346 # # Q=1022 > > # # # # # # # # > > # # P=101 # # # # # > > # # # B=344 # # # # > >P=103 P=103 P=98 # # R=553 P=103 P=115 > > # # # # # R=555 K=15993 # > > >HCW=1 HCB=1 >cannotCW=1 cannotCB=1 >CCRW=0 CCRB=0 > >Piece Bonuses White=4 Piece Bonuses Black=-34 > >KINGEXPOSURE WHITE=3 KINGEXPOSURE BLACK=16 >DANGERSQUARES WHITE=0 DANGERSQUARES BLACK=5 >ATTACKINGFORCE WHITE=21 ATTACKINGFORCE BLACK=0 >ATTACKTOTAL WHITE=240 ATTACKTOTAL BLACK=0 > > >EVALUATION : 71 (positive means WHITE is winning) For Amateur: r3q1k1/ppp1rp2/2n1b2Q/8/2P5/3B4/PPP2RPP/5RK1 b - - Using a static eval, I get different results if it is White or Black doing the evaluating. I guess this is a result of my asymmetrical king-safety. White says +0.73, Black says +1.29 (+ is good for white). Does anyone else do this asymetrically? Will
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.