Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No forbidden testing for Shredder4/Genius6.5 (Was: Suggestion to SSDF)

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 04:54:20 12/04/99

Go up one level in this thread


On December 04, 1999 at 07:43:10, Harald Faber wrote:

>On December 03, 1999 at 19:19:42, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On December 03, 1999 at 13:37:58, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:
>>
>>>	Instead of giving code numbers to the secret entries, give them codenames! I
>>>suggest using the names of famous masked wrestlers, like 'el Santo', 'Blue
>>>Daemon', 'el Solitario', 'Lizmark', 'Canek', 'Atlantis', 'Mil Máscaras',
>>>'Universo 2000', 'Pentagón', 'Pierrot', etc.
>>>	That way, you can publish the list with all the entries, without compromising
>>>the secret nature of the programs, giving the readers a chance to compare their
>>>progress from one list to the next. Also, the use of masked wrestlers names
>>>seems fully appropiate, as their identity is also secret.
>>>José.
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I have already suggested that. I´m tired of all this nonsense already and I
>>suggest we should publish all results of all programs. If any company have any
>>prevarications about our results let them prove why our results are misleading
>>and let this forum judge who are right.
>>
>>We are still forbidden to publish results with Shredder4 but in my opinion it´s
>>our duty to do so whatever mr Weiner says. An alternative should be that mr
>>Faber(as suggested by himself(thanks!)) or someone else publish the results!
>
>
>I have read the manual very carefully, and in this my manual there is no word of
>forbidden testin or publishing results. Is it contained in yours?
>
>
>
>>He have tried all kinds of manmanouvers to make our list doubtful, but from now
>>on I think he should deliver clear proofs for that. He or someone else also
>>seems to have used torpedoes that tried to prove with statistics that our
>>organisation is corrupt. In this forum it was a matematician who tried to prove
>>that the SSDF was corrupted, I guess the same man tries to understand the world
>>with statistics also. This man thought for instance that christmas was in
>>october or november, but maybe he could prove it with statistics.
>>
>>Only my personal opinion Bertil
Hallo!

Thank you for your information! No we don´t have it yet.

Regards Bertil SSDF



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.