Author: Keith Kitson
Date: 01:09:04 12/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 1999 at 17:45:17, Lonnie Cook wrote: >On December 04, 1999 at 16:59:57, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >>After a few hours lost in the woods with a new interface I must say I'm rather >>satisfied with the standard windows layout. I don't go for fancy board designs, >>so returned to the old Fritz 5 layout. >> >>The program has become more stable. Sometimes my 'old' Fritz5 gui showed garbled >>pieces on the board after task switching or after energy save monitor mode, but >>with fritz6 that's over. >> >>Only thing I miss (or can't find) is to switch permanent brain off and play >>thorugh a game or an opening tree. >>Also not all commands (a few) are IMO logically placed in the pulldown menus. >> >>In blitz and bullet Fritz6 is certainly weaker, but at longer time controls I >>indeed found out (am finding out) > >I am finding out the opposite. it is stronger! > >Fritz6 is slightly stronger than Fritz5. I >>will post the results on my website asap, although I think it's more important >>Fritz6 plays a lot better against me stylewise than did Fritz5. That's why I >>love Nimzo99. > >Nimzo was atroucious! U wanna get a good feeling of playing a powerhouse, play >Wchess 2000 from within the CG6 program, aggressive as anything and smart I've played Wchwss2000 from within CG6 and it is weaker than most of the other top programs. I don't rate Wchess at all. So I don't know how you can justify this post > > Fritz6 gives me that feeling too. >> >>Are there any stronger players over here who have some thoughts about the >>"human' playing style of Fritz6? >> >>Thx. >> >>Jeroen ;-}
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.