Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Attack detection with bitboards: alternative to "rotated bitboards"

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 19:47:06 12/05/99

Go up one level in this thread

On December 05, 1999 at 11:00:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:

[snip]
>
>
>you need 256 entries because that is the number of possible states of any rank
>or diagonal.

Hmmmm. I'll have to think about this for a while. Seems wasteful on the surface.

>
>As far as 64 bits goes, within 5 years that is _all_ we will have.  Better to
>plan for the future.  It is almost the present.  :)

Heck, I cannot even get the present working. ;)

KarinsDad :)

• Re: Attack detection with bitboards: alternative to "rotated bitboards" Robert Hyatt 05:53:12 12/06/99
  • Re: Attack detection with bitboards: alternative to "rotated bitboards" Bas Hamstra 06:55:33 12/06/99
  • Re: Attack detection with bitboards: alternative to "rotated bitboards" Inmann Werner 06:12:29 12/06/99
    • Re: Attack detection with bitboards: alternative to "rotated bitboards" Inmann Werner 06:39:01 12/06/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.